AHP-De Borda: a hybrid multicriteria ranking method





Ranking, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decision, Multicriteria


De Borda voting method was proposed in the period of French revolution to be used in a multiple decision-maker environment. Later, it was adapted to multicriteria ranking problems. The adoption of criteria weights in De Borda modeling is an evolution of the original De Borda method; despite this fact, evolution does not approach how to define the weights, that is: the weights are an input to De Borda. The proposal is to segment the problem into two ones. The first is a weight assignment problem and was approached through AHP modeling. The second problem is a ranking problem, being approached through De Borda method. AHP and De Borda are based in principles from different multicriteria Decision Schools: AHP is classified into the American School; De Borda is recognized as a French method. This paper shows that it is possible to use both methods, in a complementary way. The proposal can assist and support decision makers in the modeling of multicriteria ranking problems by assigning weights to the criteria under a systematized way. This hybrid approach proposes a better way for the structuring of the problem, by linking an approach that natively supports the assignment of weights (AHP) into another devoted to the ordering of objects (De Borda).


Download data is not yet available.




How to Cite

Costa, H. G. (2017). AHP-De Borda: a hybrid multicriteria ranking method. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14.n3.a1

Most read articles by the same author(s)