Characteristics of Education 4.0

its possibilities in time of Pandemic

Authors

  • Carlos Alberto Schettini Pinto Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca (CEFET) / Center for Personnel Studies and Fort Duque de Caxias (CEP), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6674-289X
  • Augusto da Cunha Reis Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca (CEFET) / Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2022.1554

Keywords:

education 4.0, pandemic, New educational techonolgies

Abstract

Highlights: Education 4.0, prioritizes practical experimentation on the part of students, intensifies the understanding of the “maker culture”. Education 4.0 consists of an advanced theoretical-practical approach to management and teaching in formal education. We can see those features such as Digital Didactic Material, Hybrid Teaching, Digital Interactivity, Autonomous Learning and New Information and Communication Technologies were essential for education not to be stagnant in time x space during the COVID 19. Teachers need to innovate and renew their knowledge constantly. In the 4.0 environment, acting as guides, tutors, advisors, they need to be connected with the reality and the actuality of the facts, so that they can correctly lead their students in the construction of knowledge.

Goal: The present study aims to present, from the main characteristics of Education 4.0, its possibilities and applicability in times of pandemic.

Design / Methodology / Approach: As a subsidy, an exploratory study was carried out through bibliographic research in the main research bases in order to obtain updated knowledge on the theme of Education 4.0.

Results: The results denote the importance of the applicability of the main ideas of this form of education in the current and future moment, mainly because the current and future generations are very involved in the concepts of connectivity and hybrid learning.

Limitations of the Investigation: The limitations of this research reside in the fact that, as it is a new situation, which had to be adopted almost instantly, it needs to have a greater maturity and there is a need for further research and studies, mainly in the search for the best application of technologies in the educational field.

Practical implications: The practical implications highlight that the use of technologies in education is a reality in which teachers and students should increasingly perceive themselves as immersed and open to new educational possibilities.

Originality/Value: The originality lies in the fact that the various educational institutions, at different educational levels, had to adapt to a new reality imposed by the pandemic situation, where the need for the massive use of technology was fundamental for the minimum maintenance of the teaching-learning process. And this work sought to denote these characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cabezas, M. (2019), “Tecnologia Aplicada al Aprendizaje, Tecnopedagogia”, 05 august 2019. available from: https://taa.utec.edu.uy/utectecnopedagogia/ (access 13 April 2021).

Carvalho Neto, C. Z. (2020), “Educação 4.0: Microvisão Teórico-tecnológica”, ESTAP Nível I, 06 to 09 October 2020, available from: http://www.cep.eb.mil.br/images/estap/Palestra_ESTAP-DrCassiano.pdf (access 12 April 2021).

Carvalho Neto, C. Z. (2006), “Espaços ciberarquitetônicos e a integração de mídias por meio de técnicas derivadas de tecnologias dedicadas à educação“, Dissertação de Mestrado defendida perante o Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis.

Dicio. (2021), “Dicionário Online de Português, Transdisciplinaridade”, available from: https://www.dicio.com.br/transdisciplinar/ (access 12 April 2021).

Fhur, R. C. (2019), ”Educação 4.0: nos impactos da quarta revolução industrial”, 2 ed, Editora Appris, Curitiba. Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (2021), ”O que é inteligência artificial?”, available from: https://www.hpe.com/br/pt/whatis/artificialintelligence.html#:~:text=Intelig%C3%AAncia%20artificial%20(IA)%20%C3%A9%20um,assim%20como%20a%20mente%20humana (access 12 April 2021).

Instituto Ayrton Senna. (2019), ”Pensamento computacional e programação como ferramenta de aprendizagem”, 14 October 2019, available from: https://institutoayrtonsenna.org.br/pt-br/meueducador-meu-idolo/materialdeeducacao/pensamento-computacional-e-programacaocomoferramentas-de-aprendizagem.html (13 April 2021).

Lemann Foundation. (2016), ”Ensino híbrido, Personalização e tecnologia na educação”, 8 February 2016, available from: https://fundacaolemann.org.br/noticias/ensino-hibrido?gclid=Cj0KCQjw38DBhDpARIsADJ3kjnMLYOe4ayvIzlz1Gzkv0t2OWcLAlIjzGESy9L46P7QmMtIzfW6gw8aAnEXEALw_wcB (access 12 April 2021).

Lévy, P. (1999), ”Cibercultura”, Editora 34, São Paulo.

Rasquilha, L.; Veras, M. (2019), ”Educação 4.0: o mundo, a escola e o aluno na década de 2020-2030”, Unità Editora, Campinas.

Reis, J., Espírito Santo, P. and Melão, N. (2021), “Influence of artificial intelligence on public employment and its impact on politics: a systematic literature review”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, e20211114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.010 (access 31 May 2022).

SEED-PR. (2021), ”Secretaria da Educação do Paraná, Pensamento Computacional”, available from: http://www.educadores.diaadia.pr.gov.br/modules/conteudo/conteudo.php?conteudo=1625 (access 14 April 2021).

Tokarz, B. et al. (2021), “Systematic literature review: opportunities and trends to the post-outbreak period of COVID-19”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, e20211146, Available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.030 (access 31 May 2022).

UNESCO. (2021), ”TIC na educação do Brasil”, available from: https://pt.unesco.org/fieldoffice/brasilia/expertise/ict-education-brazil (access 12 April 2021).

Valença, M. M; Tostes, A. P. B. (2019), ”O storytelling como ferramenta de aprendizado ativo”, Revista Carta Internacional, Belo Horizonte, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 221-243, available from: https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v14n2.2019.917 (access 14 April 2021).

Vefago, Y.B., Trierweiller, A.C. and Barcellos de Paula, L. (2020), “The third mission of universities: the entrepreneurial university”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, e2020971.

Vilela, J. M. F., Faria Filho, J. R.(2022), “Industry 4.0 and 5G Technology on Firms Network: a balanced competitive expansion conceptual model development”, BrazilianJournalofOperationsandProductionManagement, Vol.19, No.3, e20221426, available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2020.042 (access 31 May 2022).

Cabezas, M. (2019), ”Tecnologia Aplicada al Aprendizaje, Tecnopedagogia”. 05 august 2019, available from: https://taa.utec.edu.uy/utectecnopedagogia/ (access 13 April 2021).

Carvalho Neto, C. Z. (2006), “Espaços ciberarquitetônicos e a integração de mídias por meio de técnicas derivadas de tecnologias dedicadas à educação“, Dissertação de Mestrado defendida perante o Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis.

Dicio. (2021), ”Dicionário Online de Português, Transdisciplinaridade”, available from: https://www.dicio.com.br/transdisciplinar/ (access 12 April 2021).

Fhur, R. C. (2019), ”Educação 4.0: nos impactos da quarta revolução industrial”, 2 ed, Editora Appris, Curitiba. Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (2021), ”O que é inteligência artificial? ”, available from: https://www.hpe.com/br/pt/whatis/artificialintelligence.html#:~:text=Intelig%C3%AAncia%20artificial%20(IA)%20%C3%A9%20um,assim%20como%20a%20mente%20humana (access 12 April 2021).

Instituto Ayrton Senna. (2019), ”Pensamento computacional e programação como ferramenta de aprendizagem”, 14 October 2019, available from: https://institutoayrtonsenna.org.br/pt-br/meueducador-meu-idolo/materialdeeducacao/pensamento-computacional-e-programacao-comoferramentas-de-aprendizagem.html (13 April 2021).

Lemann Foundation. (2016), ”Ensino híbrido, Personalização e tecnologia na educação”, 8 February 2016, available from: https://fundacaolemann.org.br/noticias/ensino-hibrido?gclid=Cj0KCQjw38DBhDpARIsADJ3kjnMLYOe4ayvIzlz1Gzkv0t2OWcLAlIjzGESy9L46P7QmMtIzfW6gw8aAnEXEALw_wcB (access 12 April 2021).

Lévy, P. (1999), ”Cibercultura”, Editora 34, São Paulo.

Rasquilha, L.; Veras, M. (2019), ”Educação 4.0: o mundo, a escola e o aluno na década de 2020-2030”, Unità Editora, Campinas.

Reis, J., Espírito Santo, P. and Melão, N. (2021), “Influence of artificial intelligence on public employment and its impact on politics: a systematic literature review”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, e20211114, available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.010 (access 31 May 2022).

SEED-PR. (2021), ”Secretaria da Educação do Paraná, Pensamento Computacional”, available from: http://www.educadores.diaadia.pr.gov.br/modules/conteudo/conteudo.php?conteudo=1625 (access 14 April 2021).

Tokarz, B., Kohlbeck, E., Beuren, F.H. et al. (2021), “Systematic literature review: opportunities and trends to the post-outbreak period of COVID-19”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, e20211146, available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.030 (access 31 May 2022).

UNESCO. (2021), ”TIC na educação do Brasil”, available from: https://pt.unesco.org/fieldoffice/brasilia/expertise/ict-education-brazil (access 12 April 2021).

Valença, M. M; Tostes, A. P. B. (2019), O storytelling como ferramenta de aprendizado ativo, Revista Carta Internacional, Belo Horizonte, vol. 14, No, 2, pp. 221-243, available from: https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v14n2.2019.917 (access 14 April 2021).

Vefago, Y. B., Trierweiller, A.C. and Barcellos de Paula, L. (2020), “The third mission of universities: the entrepreneurial university”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, e2020971.

Vilela, J. M. F., Faria Filho, J. R.(2022), “Industry 4.0 and 5G Technology on Firms Network: a balanced competitive expansion conceptual model development”, Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.19, No. 3 ,e20221426, available from: https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2020.042 (access 31 May 2022).

Downloads

Published

2022-07-11

How to Cite

Pinto, C. A. S., & Reis, A. da C. . (2022). Characteristics of Education 4.0: its possibilities in time of Pandemic. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2022.1554

Issue

Section

Literature review