A knowledge management perspective of the project management office

Authors

  • Jeniffer de Nadae University of São Paulo
  • Marly Monteiro de Carvalho University of São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14.n3.a8

Keywords:

Knowledge Management, SECI model, Project Management Office, Brazilian Case studies.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the converting projects tacit knowledge into an available explicit knowledge in Project Management Offices, using the SECI model to analyze these processes. Using case studies, the information was gathered by in loco observation, interviews with PMO managers and project managers, and document analysis. The results show the socialization, externalization, combination and internalization, SECI in PMOs level, helping to visualize the process of transforming project tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge and to understand that knowledge must be incorporated into operational practices, rules in databases, and company history. Organizational culture was presented itself as a major factor, influencing this process of sharing knowledge among employees from the two companies studied. The steps of the spiral of knowledge, using the SECI model for the conversion of knowledge, the stage and how companies apply this conversion, show that these processes happen on a daily basis and continuously if the team understands this need. Project managers have to emphasizes the important of knowledge management, knowledge sharing and knowledge storage during the development of projects. Mainly PMO has an important role in the process of storage and sharing of knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jeniffer de Nadae, University of São Paulo

Business Administration department at Federal University of Cariri, Ceará State, Brazil. 

Downloads

Published

2017-09-06

How to Cite

Nadae, J. de, & Monteiro de Carvalho, M. (2017). A knowledge management perspective of the project management office. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14.n3.a8

Most read articles by the same author(s)