Economic feasibility and cost–benefit analysis of additive manufacturing in public sector production
Evidence from Indian factories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2883.2026Keywords:
Additive Manufacturing, Economic Feasibility, Cost–Benefit Analysis, Technology Integration, Indian Public Sector FactoriesAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to examine the economic sustainability and cost-benefit results of implementing the technologies of Additive Manufacturing (AM) into the production systems of large-scale enterprises in Indian state factories, which is under-researched in the current literature.
Design/methodology/approach: It was developed on the basis of a quantitative research design with the help of a stratified random sampling model, where 397 respondents, who represent both managerial and operational positions, were asked. The data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire, and reliability analysis was performed to prove a high internal consistency of the questionnaires (Economic Feasibility α = 0.89; Cost-Benefit Perception α = 0.91). The analysis used multivariate tests to test the demographic and organizational factors on the perceived feasibility and regression analysis to measure the relationship between perceived economic viability and projected cost benefit realization.
Results: The analysis shows that there is very little effect of gender and age on the perceptions about AM adoption. But organizational designation, especially managerial position, can be a strong influence of expectations on the changes in product quality and operation efficiency. The theoretical basis of the findings lies in Technology Organization Environment framework and Resource based view, which offer the strategic significance of economic viability in technology adoption in the public sector.
Research Implications: The study has implications on the literature by providing empirical evidence on the economic and organizational aspects of AM adoption in the government sector manufacturing that adds to the theoretical debate on integration of technology in emerging economies.
Practical and Social Implications: AM integration is viewed as cost-effective, operationally and strategically advantageous, although there are fears of initial investments and compliance with regulations. The results offer practical lessons to the policymakers and industry leaders to develop investment strategies, training and regulatory frameworks that can expedite the adoption of AM.
Downloads
References
Achillas, Ch. et al. (2014) 'A methodological framework for the inclusion of modern additive manufacturing into the production portfolio of a focused factory,' Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, pp. 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.014
Baumers, M. (2012) Economic aspects of additive manufacturing : benefits, costs and energy consumption. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/10768
Handfield, R. B., Aitken, J., Turner, N., Boehme, T., & Bozarth, C. (2022). Assessing Adoption Factors for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Case Studies. Logistics, 6(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020036
Kantaros, A., Zacharia, P., Drosos, C., Papoutsidakis, M., Pallis, E., & Ganetsos, T. (2025). Smart infrastructure and additive manufacturing: synergies, advantages, and limitations. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3719. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073719
Lamei, Z. (2021) A comprehensive cost estimation for additive manufacturing. https://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/21751
Lynch, P., Hasbrouck, C.R., Wilck, J., Kay, M. and Manogharan, G., 2020. Challenges and opportunities to integrate the oldest and newest manufacturing processes: metal casting and additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 26(6), pp.1145-1154.
Mehrpouya, M. et al. (2021b) 'The benefits of additive manufacturing for sustainable design and production,' in Elsevier eBooks, pp. 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818115-7.00009-2
Mellor, S., Hao, L. and Zhang, D. (2013) 'Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation,' International Journal of Production Economics, 149, pp. 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.008
Naghshineh, B. Mapping the enhancing effects of additive manufacturing technology adoption on supply chain agility. Manag Rev Q 75, 119–137 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00376-y
Oettmeier, K. and Hofmann, E. (2016) 'Additive manufacturing technology adoption: an empirical analysis of general and supply chain-related determinants,' Journal of Business Economics, 87(1), pp. 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0806-8
Ojha, V.K., Goyal, S. and Chand, M. (2023) 'Data-driven decision making in advanced manufacturing Systems: modeling and analysis of critical success factors,' Journal of Decision System, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2263676
Okokpujie, I. P., & Tartibu, L. K. (2024). Study of the economic viability of internet of things (IoTs) in additive and advanced manufacturing: A comprehensive review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10(5), 3175–3194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00822-7
Priyadarshini, J. et al. (2023) 'Supply chain resilience and improving sustainability through additive manufacturing implementation: a systematic literature review and framework,' Production Planning & Control, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2267507
Rasheed, A., San, O. and Kvamsdal, T. (2020) 'Digital Twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective,' IEEE Access, 8, pp. 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2970143
Rupp, M. (2023) Additive Manufacturing in Industry 4.0: Economical analysis of metal components. https://doi.org/10.59019/tkma5080
Rylands B, Böhme T, Gorkin R, Fan J, Birtchnell T (2016), "The adoption process and impact of additive manufacturing on manufacturing systems". Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 27 No. 7 pp. 969–989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0117
Soni, N., Renna, G., & Leo, P. (2024). A brief analysis of corrosion-induced degradation in metallic materials: a challenge in additive manufacturing. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 11(4), 2842–2875. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068x.2024.2432727
Thomas, D. (2015) 'Costs, benefits, and adoption of additive manufacturing: a supply chain perspective,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85(5–8), pp. 1857–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7973-6
Thomas, D.S. and Gilbert, S.W. (2014) Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.1176
Urbanic, R.J. and Saqib, S.M. (2019) 'A manufacturing cost analysis framework to evaluate machining and fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing approaches,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102(9–12), pp. 3091–3108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03394-x
Vanerio, D., Guagliano, M., & Bagherifard, S. (2024). Emerging trends in large format additive manufacturing processes and hybrid techniques. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10(4), 1945–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00771-1
Verboeket, V., Krikke, H. and Salmi, M. (2024) 'Implementing additive manufacturing in orthopedic shoe Supply Chains—Cost and lead time comparison,' Logistics, 8(2), p. 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8020049
Woldesilassiea, T. L., Lemu, H. G., & Gutema, E. M. (2024). Impacts of Adopting Additive Manufacturing Process on Supply Chain: Systematic Literature Review. Logistics, 8(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jitendra Kumar, Mahendra Sahu, Vinay Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors must have a written permission from any third-party materials used in the article, such as figures and graphics. The permission must explicitly allow authors to use the materials. The permission should be submitted with the article, as a supplementary file.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after BJO&PM publishes it (See The Effect of Open Access).
