Are the resources provided by Business Incubators suitable to the needs of their customers?
A methodology proposal to assess customer satisfaction in Business Incubators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.1565.2022Keywords:
Business Incubators, Methodology, Models and Typologies, Resource Based View, Entrepreneurship, Customer Satisfaction AssessmentAbstract
Highlights: Studies on business incubation reveal that little is known about what incubatees really want and need. What are their challenges? Are the available resources adequate to meet them? This work attempts to find methods to assist in answering these questions.
Goal: The present study investigates the suitability of resources supplied by incubators to the needs of incubated firms with the goal of proposing a methodology to assess resources’ customer satisfaction and identify opportunities for satisfaction enhancement.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology integrates the research on Models and Typologies of incubators with the Resource-Based View and adopts a comparative customer-supplier framework aiming to enable a systemic approach to customer satisfaction. For validation purposes, empirical investigation was conducted in an incubator located in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Field investigation adopted mixed methods through semi-structured interviews and convenience sample selection.
Results: The empirical testing shows the methodology meets its purposes. Findings on customer satisfaction indicate three clear opportunities towards its enhancement.
Limitations of the investigation: The methodology was validated in one incubator with small population and sample.
Practical Implications: The methodology applied to a single incubator provides in-house reference to satisfaction enhancement. Aiming further-reaching initiatives, the methodology should be evaluated on larger samples and tailored to address cross-incubator comparison.
Originality/ Value: The method combines two stablished theoretical strands on incubation with a comparative customer-supplier approach. The resultant framework enables a systemic approach to customer satisfaction grounded in a set of field survey-collected information.
Downloads
References
Albort-Morant, G. and Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2016), “A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 5, pp.1775–1779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.054
Ammetller, G., Rodriguez-Ardurab, I. and Llados-Masllorens, J. (2014), “Entrepreneurial decisions: Insights into the use of support services for new business creation”, South African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 45, No.4, pp.11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v45i4.137
Barbero, J.L., Casillas, J.C., Wright, M. and Ramos Garcia, A. (2013), “Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations?” The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.151–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9308-9
Barney, J.B. (2001), “Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp.643–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
Barney, J.B. and Arikan, A.M. (2017), “The Resource-based View. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management”, pp.123–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00006.x
Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Baptista Narcizo, R., Gabbay Canen, A., Tammela, I., Cardoso, R., and Eleutério Delesposte, J. (2019), “ Innovation capability maturity in non-RandD performers: a reference model”, Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2019.v16.n2.a5
Barge-Gil, A., Jesus Nieto, M., and Santamaría, L. (2011), “Hidden innovators: The role of non-RandD activities”, Technology analysis and Strategic management, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 415-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.558400
Becker, B. and Gassmann, O. (2006), “Corporate Incubators: Industrial RandD and What Universities can Learn from them”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 469–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0008-6
Bergek, A. and Norrman, C. (2008), “Incubator best practice: A framework”, Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, pp.20–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008
Borges, M.R. and Bueno, J.M. (2020), “O Processo de Incubação Auxilia no Desenvolvimento das Capacidades Adaptativa, Absortiva e Inovativa? Estudos de Casos Múltiplos na Região do Triângulo Mineiro e Alto Paranaíba”, Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v9i2.1309
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B. and Groen, A. (2012), “The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations”, Technovation, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp.110–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003
Carayannis, E.G. and von Zedtwitz, M. (2005), “Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices”, Technovation, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 95–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00072-5
Chinsomboon, O.M. (2000), “Incubators in the new economy”. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/9258
Eschholz, V., Silva, M. C., Rampasso, I.S., Anholon, R., and Cooper Ordonez, R. E. (2018), “Primary criteria used by business incubators for the selection of new enterprises: analysis of selection notices”, Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 224–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2018.v15.n2.a5
Ghobril, Alexandre Nabil, et al. (2019), “Cooperação entre corporações e startups em programas de corporate venture”. FACEF Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Gestão, Vol. 22, No. 3. https://periodicos.unifacef.com.br/index.php/facefpesquisa/article/view/1751
Grimaldi, R., Grandi, A. (2005), “Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models” Technovation, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 111-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00076-2
Hansen, Morten T. et al. (2000), “Networked incubators. Harvard Business Review”, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp.74-84. https://www.academia.edu/download/54356602/Networked_Incubators.pdf
Hausberg, J.P. and Korreck, S. (2021), “Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review”, Handbook of Research on Business and Technology Incubation and Acceleration, pp.39–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974783.00009
Higgins, J.P.T. and Green, S. E. (2011), “Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.1.0”, [updated March 2011], The Cochrane Collaboration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.ch2
Hong, Jin, Lu, Jinfeng (2016), “Assessing the effectiveness of business incubators in fostering SMEs: evidence from China”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 20, No. 1-2, pp.45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2016.075298
Lose, Thobekan, Tengeh, Robertson K. (2016), “An evaluation of the effectiveness of business incubation programs: a user satisfaction approach. Investment Management and Financial Innovations”, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.370-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.12
McAdam, Maura and Marlow, Susan (2007), “Building futures or stealing secrets? Entrepreneurial cooperation v and conflict within business incubators, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp.361-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607078563
Messeghem, Karim et al. (2017), “Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp.658–680.
Mian, Sarfraz, Lamine, Wadid and Fayolle, Alain (2016), “Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge”, Technovation, 50, pp.1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
Pauwels, Charlotte et al. (2016), “Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator”, Technovation, 50, pp.13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
Smilor, R. W. and Gill, M. D. (1986), “The new business incubator: Linking talent. Technology, Capital, and Know- How”, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Theodorakopoulos, N., Kakabadse, N. and McGowan, Carmel (2017), “What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorizing”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.602-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-09-2014-0152
Van Weele, M., Van Rijnsoever, F. J. and Nauta, F. (2017), “You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness”, Technovation, 59, pp.18-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.004
Wang, H., Dechang Lin, Hong Yin, Qiang Lu and Haiqing Cheng (2008), “Linking incubator services to the performance of incubated firms: A review”, 2008 4th I EEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icmit.2008.4654485
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Suzan Lee Hanson, Fernando Oliveira de Araujo, Dennis Hanson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors must have a written permission from any third-party materials used in the article, such as figures and graphics. The permission must explicitly allow authors to use the materials. The permission should be submitted with the article, as a supplementary file.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after BJO&PM publishes it (See The Effect of Open Access).
